Translator's Note
More
than 20 years ago, I said in an article in The Illustrated Weekly
of India that "Hindus know less about their
religion than Christians and Muslims know about theirs".
Wanting to verify the statement, my editor Sardar Khushwant Singh
asked my colleagues (most of them were Hindus), in schoolmasterly
fashion, to name any four Upanishads. For moments there was
silence and it was a Muslim lady member of the staff who
eventually responded to the editor's question by "reeling
off" the names of six or seven Upanishads.
Why are
"educated" Hindus ignorant about their religion? Is it
their education itself that has alienated them from their
religious and cultural moorings? If so it must be one of the
tragic ironies of the Indian condition. The Paramaguru himself speaks of our ignorance of the basic texts
of our religion (Chapter 1, Part Five): "We must be proud of
the fact that our country has produced more men who have found
inner bliss than all other countries put together. It is a matter
of shame that we are ignorant of the sastras that they have
bequeathed to us, the sastras that taught them how to scale the
heights of bliss. Many are ignorant about the scripture that is
the very source of our religion -- they do not know even its
name... Our education follows the Western pattern. We want to
speak like the white man, dress like him and ape him in the
matter of manners and customs..."
The fact is that
during the past two or three centuries Hindus have gone through a
process of de-Hinduization which in some respects is tantamount
to de Indianization. Various other reasons are given as to why
Hindus do not have a clear idea of their religion. One is that it
is not a religion in the sense the term is usually understood.
Another is that it is not easily reduced to a catechism. A third
reason is that, unlike other faiths, it encompasses all life and
activity, individual, social and national, and all spheres of
knowledge. Hindu Dharma is an organic part of the Hindu. It
imposes on him a discipline that is inward as well as outward and
it is a process of refinement and inner growth. Above all it is a
quest, the quest for knowing oneself, for being oneself.
Hindu Dharma, it
must be remembered, is but a convenient term for what should
ideally be known as Veda Dharma or Sanatana Dharma, the
immemorial religion. Indeed, it might be claimed with truth, that
this Dharma is more than a religion, that it is an entire
civilization, the story of man from the very beginnings of time
to find an answer to the problems of life, the story of that
greatest of all adventures, that of the human spirit trying to
discover its true identity. "From our total reactions to
Nature," says J.W.N. Sullivan, "Science selects a small
part only as being relevant to its purpose..." Everything is
relevant to Hinduism because its "purposes" is to know
the Truth in its entirety, not fractions of truth that may have
their own purposes but not the Great Purpose of knitting together
everything to arrive at the ultimate knowledge. It needs a master
to speak about such a religion. We must consider ourselves
blessed that we had such a master living in our own time, I mean
the Sage of Kanchi, Pujyasri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swami,
to teach us our Dharma. He was no ordinary master, but a Master
of Masters.
This Great
Master's discourses on Hindu Dharma, included in Volumes I and II
of Deivattin Kural, are divided into 22 parts (there are two
appendices in addition) in this book. There is, however, 'nothing
rigid about this arrangement and we have here a single great
stream that takes us through the variegated landscape that has
come to be called Hinduism. To vary the imagery, it is a vast
canvas on which the Paramaguru portrays the Hindu religion and it
is a luminous canvas and there is nothing garish about the colors
he dabs on it.
The Great Acharya
does not lecture from a high pedestal. Out of his compassion for
us he speaks the language that everybody understands. (We must
here acknowledge our profound indebtedness to Sri Ra. Ganapati,
the compiler of Deivattin Kural, and Sri A. Tirunavukkarasu, the
publisher, for having preserved the Sage of Kanchi's light of
knowledge and wisdom for posterity.)
Throughout these
discourses we recognize the Great Swami's synaptic vision. He
sees connections where others see only differences. Is this not
the special quality of a seer, the special quality of a mystic,
who refuses to see things in compartments? Indeed, during the
long decades during which Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swami
was the Sankaracharya of Kanchi Kamakoti Pitha he was a great
unifying force, a great civilizing influence. The manner in which
he braids together the karmakanda and jnanakanda of the Vedas is
indeed masterly. So too the way he presents the message of the
Vedas or the essence of the Upanishads. Here we have something
like the architectonics of great music or of a great monument
like the Kailsanatha temple of Ellora or the Brhadisvara temple
of Tanjavur. The Paramaguru takes all branches of knowledge in
his stride, linguistics, astronomy, history, physics. He combines
ancient wisdom with modern concepts like those of time and space
-- he is aware, though, that some of these concepts are not new
to our own scientific tradition. All the same, it must be noted
that he does not speak what is convenient for today but what is
true for all time.
It is
difficult to summarise the ideas of our religion or to present
the teachings of our Master in a few words. But it is necessary
to underline certain points. For instance, the message of the
Vedas on which Hindu Dharma is founded. "The Vedas hold
out," declares the Paramaguru, the ideal of liberation here
itself. That is their glory. Other religions hold before people
the ideal of salvation after a man's departure for another
world." To repeat, the ultimate teaching of the Vedic
religion is liberation here and now. After all, what is the
purpose of any religion? Our Acharya answers the question:
"If an individual owing allegiance to a religion does not
become a jnanin with inward experience of the truth of the
Supreme Being, what does it matter whether that religion does
exist or does not?"
"That thou
art," is the great truth proclaimed by the Vedas. But how
are you to realize the truth of "That"? Our Master's
answer is: "Now itself when we are deeply involved in
worldly affairs." In fact he tells us the practical means of
becoming a jivanmukta, or how to be liberated in this life
itself. After all, he was a jivanmukta himself and he speaks of
truths not from a vacuum but from actual experience. That reminds
one of the special feature of Hindu Dharma which is that it
contains the practical steps to liberation; in other words
Hinduism leads one to the Light in gradual stages. Critics call
this Dharma ritual-ridden without realizing that the rituals have
a higher purpose, that of disciplining you, cleansing your
consciousness, and preparing you for the inward journey. In a
word, chitta - suddhi is the means to a higher end. From work we
must go to worklessness. The Paramaguru's genius for synthesizing
ideas is demonstrated in the way he weaves together karma,
bhakti, yoga and jnana.
In our Vedic
religion, individual salvation is not --- as is often alleged ---
pursued to the neglect of collective well-being. "The
principle on which the Vedic religion is founded," observes
the Sage of Kanchi "is that a man must not live for himself
alone but serve all mankind." Well, varna dharma in its true
form is a system according to which the collective welfare of
society is ensured. As expounded by the Paramaguru, we see it to
be radically different from what we are taught about it in
school. Critics call caste a hierarchic and exploitative
arrangement. But actually, the system is one in which the duties
of each jati are interlinked with those of others. In this way
society is knit together, leaving no room in it for jealousies
and rivalries to arise. One point must be specially noted: the
Great Acharya lays stress again and again on the fact that no
jati is inferior to another jati or superior to it.
In the
varna dharma, as explained by our Master, the Brahmin does not
lord it over other communities. Why do we need Brahmins at all?
To preserve the Vedic dharma, to keep alive the sound of the
Vedas which is important for the well-being not only of all
Hindus but of all mankind. This duty can be performed only on a
hereditary basis by one class of people. The Great Acharya goes
to the extent of saying that we do not need a class of people
called Brahmins if they do not serve other communities, indeed
mankind itself, by truly practicing the ancient Vedic dharma. To
paraphrase, if a separate class called Brahmins must exist and it
must exist is not for the sake of this class itself but for the
ultimate good of mankind. The Paramaguru, makes an impassioned
plea to Brahmins to return to their dharma. He also points out
that in varna dharma, in its ideal form, there are no differences
among the jatis economically speaking -- all of them live a
simple life, performing their duties and being devoted to the
Lord.
It is varna
dharma that has sustained Hindus or Indian civilization for all
these millennia, observes the Paramaguru. And all our immense
achievements in metaphysics and philosophy, in literature, in
music, in the arts and sciences must be attributed to it. Above
all, it is varna dharma that has made it possible for this land
to produce so many great men and women, so many saintly men, who
have been the source of inspiration for people all these
centuries. Now this system has all but broken up and with it we
see the decay of the nation.
There are
so many other matters on which the Sage of Kanchi speaks -- for
example, conducting an upanayana or a marriage meaningfully. He
speaks with eloquence about our ideals of marriage and condemns
dowry, describing it as an evil that undermines our society.
There are, then, moving discourses on philanthropy, love and so
on in which we see the Great Master as one who is concerned about
the happiness of all, as one whose heart goes out to the poor and
the suffering. His short discourses like "Outward Karma -
Inward Meditation" or "Karma --the Starting Point of
Yoga" encapsulate his philosophy with power and beauty. And
the message of Advaita runs like a golden thread all through the
book.
Altogether in
these discourses we come face to face with a Great Being who is
beyond time and space and we experience the "oceanic
feeling", a term (originally French) coined by Romain
Rolland and made familiar by Sigmund Freud. To us the Sage of
Kanchi means an ocean of wisdom and an ocean of compassion. To
think of him is to sanctify ourselves however unregenerate we may
be. I must now, in all humility, pay obeisance to Pujyasri
Jayendra Saraswati Swami and Pujyasri Sankara Vijayendra
Saraswati Swami and seek their blessings Sri Mettur Swamigal,
gentle, devout and learned, has been a source of inspiration to
me in my work.
I am
thankful to Sri P.S. Mishra, Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh, for
his learned Foreword.
The venerable Sri
A. Kuppuswami, who is a spry 84 and who served his Master, the
Sage of Kanchi with devotion for almost a lifetime, read the
typescript of this book running into more than 1,000 pages and
made valuable suggestions. I have always relied on him for advice
and I am grateful to him for his Introduction, although I feel I
don't deserve a bit the appreciative references he has made to
me.
I am
indebted to Sri V. Sivaramakrishnan, Associate Editor of Bhavan's
journal, for reading the proofs. With his practised eye he
detected a number of errors - he also suggested a number of
improvements. I must add that Sri Sivaramkrishnan has himself
written a book based on the Sage of Kanchi's discourses on
Sanskrit and Tamil poets and their works.
The Kamashi Seva Samithi lost one of its stalwarts in the death of its Secretary, Sri V. Krishnamurthi. For most of us the Samithi meant Sri Krishnamurthi and Sri Krishnamurthi meant the Samithi. Members of the Samithi and devotees of the Sage of Kanchi were distraught by his passing but they find consolation in the thought that he must be still be serving the lotus feet of his Master.
Sri P.N. Krihnaswami, Chairman of the Samithi, brought me cheer whenever I felt depressed about the progress of the book. I look upon him as a model of devotion to the Lord and service to fellow-men. So many others belonging to the Samithi have helped me in my work like Sri R.S. Mani, Sri V. Narayanaswami, Captain N. Swaminathan, Sri B. Ramani, and Sri A.G. Ramarathnam.
Dr W.R. Antarkar, a distinguised Sanskrit scholar, has laid me under a deep debt of gratitude by giving the once-over to the Sanskrit part of the main text. But he is not to be held responsible for mistakes, if any, that still remain uncorrected. I must also thank Sri L.N. Subramanya Ghanapathi, Dr R. Krishanmurthi Sastrigal , Sri S. Lakshminarayana, Srimati (Dr) Visalakshi Sivaramkrishnan and Sri V. Ramanathan for their assistance.
Thanks are particularly due to Siromani R. Natrajan, of Manjari fame, for his help in preparing the Tamil Glossary. He checked the notes I had made and added copious notes of his own. Owing to pressure on space all the material povided by him could not be incorporated. I also owe a debt of gratitude to Srimathi Bhavani Vanchinthan, a gifted Tamil teacher, for "double-checking" the glossary and to Srimati Saroja Krishnan for her help.
Mrs. Margaret Da'Costa converted my typescript into computer format in record time. I am thankful to her as well as to Kumari Sandhya Ganapahty: this dedicated young lady worked day and night for nearly three months to carry out my corrections. Sri R. Ganapathy gave his daughter a helping hand. There were also inputs by Sri R.S. Mani and Sri N. Ramamoorthy.
I must thank Sri S. Ramakrishan, Executive Secretary of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, for the readiness which he agreed to publish HIndu Dharma and for his unfailing courtesy, encouragement and coooperation. I must acknowledge the help received from other officials of the organisation like Sri A.P. Vasudevan, Sri C.K. Venkataraman and Sri P.V. Sankarankutty.
I am grateful to Sri Atul Goradia of Siddhi Printers for the fine job of work he has done in printing this book. He is remainded unfazed by all the problems encountered in the course of the production of this work.
In all humuility I place Hindu Dharma as an offering at the sacred lotus feet of Pujyasri Chandrasekharendra Sarasvati Swami. As one who has miles to go to become jnanin, I can look upon Mahaguru only in the form I knew him before he attained videhamukti. The dvita-bhava, it is said, is the appropriate attitude in which one expresses one's devotion to one's guru. Our Great Master is the Infinite dissolved in the Infinite. But do we not separate the Infinite from the Infinite to meditate on it and to worship It as the Saguna Brahman? It is thus that I adore the lotus feet of the Mahaguru. As the Upanishads proclaim, "Purnasya purnamadaya purnmevavsisyate."
"CHINNAVAN"
Bombay,
May 19,1995
For a general background, please see here
Previous | Next |